Call for Papers: Non-linear Dynamics in Work and Organizational Psychology

Call for Papers: Non-linear Dynamics in Work and Organizational Psychology
Guest Editors:
Dr. José Navarro, University of Barcelona (j.navarro@ub.edu),
Dr. Rita Rueff-Lopes, ESADE Business School-University Ramon Llull (rita.rueff@esade.edu)
Dr. Ramón Rico, UWA Business School (ramon.rico@uwa.edu.au)

Rationale and Objectives for the Special Issue
The field of work and organizational psychology (W/OP) is coping with increasingly complex issues, as a response to the accelerated pace of our socio-economic landscape. Consequently, our discipline is articulating research from two main approaches: a) the multilevel approach, which focuses on the need to consider different levels (i.e., micro, meso and macro) to explain any phenomena of interest; and b) the temporal approach, centred in the dynamic or changing nature of these phenomena.
Considering the current predominance of the multilevel and temporal approaches, the next step to be taken seems to be related to a non-linear dynamics approach. Non-linear dynamics depart from two basic assumptions. On the one hand, they assume the non-proportionality among variables, which means that the relationship between causes and effects is non-proportional and cannot be traced following a linear pattern. Thus, it is possible that different qualitative phenomena occur, such as chaotic dynamics, appearance of threshold values, tipping points, ceiling effects, sudden changes, and so on. In all of these changes the rule of proportionality (e.g., increments in X would suppose similar increments in Y), is not fulfilled for the complete range of values of the variables involved. For example, the vitamin model proposed by Warr (e.g., Warr 1987, 1994) is a good example of a non-linear theory. In said model, the relationship among different environmental characteristics (e.g., opportunity for control, variety of tasks) and well-being at work is curvilinear. As so, when certain values of these characteristics increase there is not necessarily an increase in levels of well-being. On the contrary, the influence of such variables on well-being at work starts to be negative.
On the other hand, non-linear dynamics focus on the study of constructs over time (i.e., on the evolution or development of constructs since they are considered as evolving processes). This second characteristic is particularly interesting for W/OP because in the field there are many processes that change from time to time and at different time scales. For example, in the case of affect at work we can consider short-term (e.g., the case of discrete emotions that can change in seconds or minutes), middle-term (e.g., the case of mood that can change in hours or days), or long-term changes (e.g., the case of temperament, which is considered as a quasi-trait; see Watson, 2000). Moreover, the field of W/OP is increasingly adopting this dynamic view in order to understand extant phenomena of interest (e.g., Navarro et al., 2015; Roe, 2008). For example, the well-known affective-events theory emphasizes the importance of the dynamic relationship among daily events at work, subsequent affective states and the behaviours or attitudes derived from this affect, being a theory that is clearly sensitive about these dynamical issues (Weiss & Cropanzano, 1996).
By combining both dimensions, i.e., the non-proportionality among variables and the focus on changes over time, non-linear dynamics represent a fruitful approach to consider in order to advance knowledge in almost all of the central topics of interest in the W/OP. However, the application of non-linear dynamic models in our field continues to be scarce (for some exceptions see Ceja & Navarro, 2012; Guastello, 2010; Rueff-Lopes et al., 2017; Solinger et al., 2015). One of the causes for said scarcity lies in the fact that non-linear dynamics require the use of some particular research designs and statistical tools that are often unknown to researchers. In particular, the study of processes in flow requires longitudinal designs in order to obtain several registers per participant (e.g., using experience sampling methods, intensive longitudinal designs, collecting data in several waves). These designs allow researchers to identify not only individual differences, but also patterns of change that evolve and emerge in unexpected ways and can only be detected when non-linear techniques are applied.
Moreover, non-linearity is better estimated through the use of a set of statistical techniques that goes beyond the traditional generalized linear model (GLM). Said techniques present two main advantages: firstly, they allow researchers to capture non-proportionality among variables, which is the essence of any non-linear technique. Secondly, they allow researchers to distinguish between non-linear relationship and random behaviour. Linear modelling is unable to manage this difference and confuses these two forms of variability in the data. For this reason, non-linear models usually explain more variance than their linear counterparts (Guastello, 2002).
Bearing these issues in mind, the specific objectives of this call are:
• To stimulate the theoretical development of different areas within W/OP but from a non-linear dynamics approach.
• To show new empirical evidence of non-linear or dynamic behaviour in any area of W/OP.
• To offer new research designs and applied analytic techniques in order to inspire and guide future research.
• To provide theoretical foundations and empirical evidences on the plentiful of non-linear relationships in W/OP.
Fulfilling these specific objectives would contribute to the progress of our discipline going beyond the generalized linear model addressing recent calls in this regard (e.g., Deboek, 2012; DeShon, 2012; Navarro et al., 2015; Ployhart & Kim, 2013; Ramos-Villagrasa et al., 2018; Scarborough & Somers, 2006).
This special issue is targeted at W/OP scholars that are developing research on this non-linear dynamic approach and modelling in any W/OP topic including, but not limiting, to a) the classic exploration of quadratic and cubic relationships among variables (using non-linear regression techniques, for example); b) the exploration of sigma-functions (another kind of cubic relations) by means of neural networks, functional data analysis, or similar procedures; and c) the exploration of linear and non-linear relationships at the same time, through more sophisticated techniques such as catastrophe modelling or fuzzy logic (e.g., fuzzy patches).

Schedule and Procedure
The deadline for submissions is October 30th 2018. Submissions should not be submitted before October 1st 2018. The special issue is intended for publication in EJWOP in the first half of 2020.
Papers to be considered for this special issue should adhere to the EJWOP policies regarding the use of cross-sectional self-report data, student samples and re-use of data from other papers (please refer to: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/authors/pewo-author-checklist.pdf). Papers should be submitted through the online system (https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/PEWO) of the journal, identifying the paper as a submission for this Special Issue. Further information on EJWOP manuscript requirements is available on the journal’s website (https://www.tandfonline.com/action/authorSubmission?journalCode=pewo20&page=instructions).
Please direct your questions about the submission process, or any administrative matter, to the Editorial Office: authorqueries@tandf.co.uk. The Guest Editors of this special issue would be happy to discuss your ideas for potential submission. Authors who are interested in contributing to this special issue are kindly requested to inform the Guest Editors of their plans via email before June 30th 2018, at j.navarro@ub.edu (Dr. José Navarro).

References
Ceja, L. & Navarro, J. (2012). ‘Suddenly I get into the zone’: Examining discontinuities and nonlinear changes in flow experiences at work. Human Relations, 65, 1101–1127. doi: 10.1177/0018726712447116
Deboek, P. R. (2012). Modeling nonlinear dynamics in intraindividual variability. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 440-458). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
DeShon, R. (2012). Multivariate dynamics in organizational science. In Kozlowski, S. W. J. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of organizational psychology (pp. 117-142). New York: Oxford University Press.
Guastello, S. J. (2002). Managing emergent phenomena: Nonlinear dynamics in work organizations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Navarro, J., Roe, R. A., & Artiles, M. I. (2015). Taking time seriously: Changing practices and perspectives in Work/Organizational Psychology. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 31, 135-145. doi: 10.1016/j.rpto.2015.07.002
Ployhart, R. E. & Kim, Y. (2013). Dynamic longitudinal growth modeling. In J. M. Cortina & R. S. Landis (Eds.), Modern research for the study of behavior in organizations (pp. 63-98). New York, NY: Routledge.
Ramos-Villagrasa, P., Marques-Quinteiro, P., Navarro, J., & Rico, R. (2018). Teams as complex adaptive systems: Reviewing 17 years of research. Small Group Research, 49, 135-176. doi: 10.1177/1046496417713849
Roe, R. A. (2008). Time in Applied Psychology. The study of “what happens” rather than “what is”. European Psychologist, 13, 37-52. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040.13.1.37
Rueff-Lopes, R., Navarro, J., Caetano, A. and Junça, A. (2017). Forecasting the influence of customer-related micro-events on employees’ emotional, attitudinal and physiological responses. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26, 79-797. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2017.1360286.
Scarborough, D. & Somers, M. J. (2006). Neural networks in organization research. Applying pattern recognition to the analysis in organizational behaviour. Washington, DC: APA.
Solinger, O. N., Hofmans, J., Bal, P. M., and Jansen, P. G. W. (2015). Bouncing back from psychological contract breach: How commitment recovers over time. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37, 494-514. doi: 10.1002/job.2047.
Warr, P. (1987). Work, unemployment, and mental health. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Warr, P. (1994). A conceptual framework for the study of work and mental health. Work & Stress, 8, 84-97-doi: 10.1080/02678379408259982
Watson, D. (2000). Mood and temperament. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Weiss, H. M. & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: An annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews (Vol. 18, pp. 1-74). Greenwich: Elsevier Science/JAI Press.